Starcraft-Esp

---StarCraft II Q&A Batch 42---

[COLOR="White"]1. What was the main reasoning to shifting the Hydralisk backwards one technology level? How does this affect the Zerg early-game, especially since the Zerg will have absolutely no anti-air units before the Hydralisks? (gamereplays.org)[/COLOR]
[COLOR="DeepSkyBlue"]Actually, the Hydralisk has been brought back down to Tier 1.5, giving Zerg early anti-air capabilities without upgrading their Hatchery to a Lair. The test originally was to put Hydralisks at a later tech and have Corruptors be buildable earlier without a prerequisite building other than upgrading to the Lair. To make this happen, the Corruptors had to be nerfed appropriately to fit that tech, which made it very weak and much less fun. Additionally, without a prerequisite building, opposing players could not scout the Zerg player to see when they were going air, which did not fit the gameplay style we were shooting for.[/COLOR]


[COLOR="White"]2. What kinds of cheats will be included in Starcraft 2, and how will they be accessed/unlocked? (starcraft.org)[/COLOR]
[COLOR="DeepSkyBlue"]There will be cheats, but you wont know what they are from us sorry.[/COLOR]


[COLOR="White"]3. Concerning resources there is one big issue for mapmakers: There are only two of them. For many UMS-maps you need more different resource-types than gas and minerals, thus mapmakers were forced to use even civilians as a sort of resource. So will mapmakers be able to place their one, gather-able resources on the map such as lumber or gold? (starcraft2.4players.de)[/COLOR]
[COLOR="DeepSkyBlue"]Yes, we have recently added support for one additional custom resource type. Additional custom resources types may be implemented in the future, but there are no plans at the moment.[/COLOR]


[COLOR="White"]4. With the Battlecruiser's new ability dealing splash damage to lightly armored air units, you could fear that the Thor has once more fallen into a role void. Is this the case or are the Battlecruiser ability and the Thor's anti-air capabilities tactically different enough? (Gamereplays.org)[/COLOR]
[COLOR="DeepSkyBlue"]The overlap is really no more different than a Siege Tank and the Yamato Gun ability or the Reaver and the Psi Storm from Brood War. The new ability helps the Battlecruiser against a specific group of units, which are units the Battlecruiser is already good against, rather than making it effective against all units. The last thing we wanted is for the Battlecruiser to kill groups of units that are supposedly effective at countering it, such as the Warp Ray.[/COLOR]


[COLOR="White"]5. Does the Battlecruisers new AoE affect friendly units in the area? (thewarcenter.net)[/COLOR]
[COLOR="DeepSkyBlue"]No, the Missile Barrage does not affect friendly units.[/COLOR]


[COLOR="White"]6. Will it be possible to use the full 3D cinematics mechanic from the single player campaign in the map editor? (sc2pod.com)[/COLOR]
[COLOR="DeepSkyBlue"]Yes, we are looking forward to seeing some awesome custom cut scenes from the community.[/COLOR]


[COLOR="White"]7. Most users know that even invisible units can be seen by experienced players since they cause this nice little blur effect while in Warcraft 3 invisible units are indeed invisible aside from leaving footprints on the ground. So what about transferring the 'real' invisibility into the World of Starcraft by allowing mapmakers to choose from those two different invisible modes for each unit? (starcraft2.4players.de)[/COLOR]
[COLOR="DeepSkyBlue"]Map makers will be able to remove the blur effect that is currently on StarCraft IIs invisible units.
[/COLOR]

Ains... ¿no tenemos paciencia para esperar que Xordiah lo saque en el foro español?

Ninguna pregunta que merezca mucho interés -_-'.

PD: La 3 es interesante, aunque era algo de esperar. Ya que estban podrían haberse mojado un poquito más y añadir 10-20 en vez de 1 ¬_¬.

Edit: Ahí lo tienes:
http://www.battle.net/forums/thread.aspx?fn=sc2-general-spanish&t=13883&p=1&#post13883

Ains... -.-...

Bah, nada nuevo. Me esperaba algo mejor la explicación de las hidras.

Bueno que bien que este en español por que si no...La idea de eliminar el efecto borroso de las unidades invisibles me parece bien.
Saludos

La pregunta 2 me parece totalmente ridicula.

No creo que sea ridícula, se puede decir que ocupa espacio, y pudieron haber puesto una pregunta de mas interés en ella... me pareció buena, ya que es un misterio pero no creo que vaya a usar Cheats o trucos en StarCraft 2...

me pareció interesante el P&R, y creo que mas en vez de decir que... "es lo que sabíamos", "mas de lo mismo", creo que como comunidad deberíamos poner nuestras preguntas, porque si te das cuentas las preguntas son de los fan sites, y blizzard como buena, tiene que responder, no creo que ellos sean los ridículos, porque ellos solo responden, no son los que preguntan... y en fin, tomando ello, creo que de ahí sacan el gusto de los gamers.

Interesante pero no muy informativo...

Bueno, ahora los zerg tienen anti aereos temprano y baratos podria decirse (no dice nada del costo, pero para unidad basica supongo q sera mas o menos lo mismo q la hydra original)...
El corruptor subio de tier, seguramente volvio a la espiral, no dicen nada del roach o del baneling


Tengo ganas de golpear al que formulo la pregunta 2, lo demas no es nada que podamos llamar ''interesante''
La habilidad de Misiles del crucero me parece q va a kedar tirada a un costado al igual que alucinacion en sc1

que bien que regresaron al hidra al tier 1.5.... aunk de los costos no creo que lo bajen de 100m 50g... aunk me encantaria que le bajaran la poblacion... voto a favor a que regrese a 1 de poblacion, pero ya es buena noticia que lo aian bajado de tier.

Sobre la polemica 2da pregunta... pues que decir... era algo que se podria esperar, la mayoria ( si no todos ) los games tienen trucos o codigos... asi que la obviedad resalta a la vista...

Interesantes las demas preguntas, aunque al parecer no para todos xD, pero tiene su atractivo lo de las cinematicas en 3d

Los zerg estan cada vez mas imba !:P buen P&R ^^

Que poquito se mojan en blizzard.. A mi me extraña que despues de una semana, solo haya habido estos cambios. Imposible vamos.
Lo de las hydras lo han dejao como en el original y el caso es que a mi tanta coincidencia ya no me parece tan bien. Lo suyo es cambiar algo la dinámica del juego pero ahora mismo (y habiendo visto no se cuantos videos) sigue siendo un starcraft original.
En mi opinión este juego requiere de más unidades nuevas y no volver a ser lo que era el original.